Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Ethnopharmacol ; 275: 114114, 2021 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33848611

RESUMO

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: As one of the first plants used by ancient people, cannabis has been used for medicinal purposes for thousands of years. The long history of medicinal cannabis use contrasts with the paucity of archaeobotanical records. Moreover, physical evidence of medicinal cannabis use in a secular context is much rarer than evidence of medicinal cannabis use in religious or ritual activities, which impedes our understanding of the history of medicinal cannabis use. AIM OF THE STUDY: This study aims to provide archaeobotanical evidence of medicinal cannabis use and analyse the specific medicinal usage of cannabis in a secular context in ancient times. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Plant remains were collected from the Laoguanshan Cemetery of the Han Dynasty in Chengdu, South China, with the archaeological flotation process and were identified based on morphological and anatomical characteristics. The examination of the medicinal significance of the remains relied on the investigation of the documentation on unearthed medical bamboo slips, the diseases of the tomb occupants, the cemetery's cultural background and Chinese historical records. RESULTS: The botanical remains were accurately identified as cannabis. More than 120 thousand fruits were found, which represents the largest amount of cannabis fruit remains that have been statistically analysed from any cemetery in the world thus far. The cannabis fruits are suspected to have been used for medical purposes in a secular context and were most likely used to stop severe bleeding of the uterus and treat lumbago and/or arthralgia. CONCLUSIONS: The cannabis fruit remains reported here likely represent the first physical evidence of medicinal cannabis use for the treatment of metrorrhagia, severe lumbago, and/or arthralgia. This study emphasizes the importance of the evidence of the diseases suffered by the occupants of the tomb in determining the medicinal use of cannabis in a secular context and contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the ancient history of medicinal cannabis.


Assuntos
Maconha Medicinal/história , Maconha Medicinal/uso terapêutico , Medicina Tradicional Chinesa/história , Secularismo , Arqueologia/história , Cannabis/anatomia & histologia , Cannabis/classificação , Cannabis/ultraestrutura , Cemitérios/história , China , Etnobotânica/história , Frutas/anatomia & histologia , Frutas/classificação , Frutas/ultraestrutura , História Antiga , Humanos , Maconha Medicinal/classificação , Medicina Tradicional Chinesa/métodos , Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura , Paleopatologia/história , Datação Radiométrica
4.
Am Univ Law Rev ; 68(3): 823-925, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30919712

RESUMO

As more states legalize cannabis, the push to "deschedule" it from the Controlled Substances Act is gaining momentum. At the same time, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved the first conventional drug containing a cannabinoid derived from cannabis­cannabidiol (CBD) for two rare seizure disorders. This would all seem to bode well for proponents of full federal legalization of medical cannabis. But some traditional providers are wary of drug companies pulling medical cannabis into the regular small molecule drug development system. The FDA's focus on precise analytical characterization and on individual active and inactive ingredients may be fundamentally inconsistent with the "entourage effects" theory of medical cannabis. Traditional providers may believe that descheduling cannabis would free them to promote and distribute their products free of federal intervention, both locally and nationally. Other producers appear to assume that descheduling would facilitate a robust market in cannabis-based edibles and dietary supplements. In fact, neither of these things is true. If cannabis were descheduled, the FDA's complex and comprehensive regulatory framework governing foods, drugs, and dietary supplements would preclude much of this anticipated commerce. For example, any medical claims about cannabis would require the seller to complete the rigorous new drug approval process, the cost of which will be prohibitive for most current traditional providers. Likely also unexpected to some, there is no pathway forward for conventional foods containing cannabis constituents, with the (probably exclusive) exception of certain hemp seed ingredients, if those foods cross state lines. And it will certainly come as a shock to many that federal law already prohibits the sale of dietary supplements containing CBD--including those already on the market as well as those made from "hemp," which has recently been descheduled under the 2018 Farm Bill. This Article describes in detail the surprising reach of the FDA and then outlines three modest, but legal, pathways forward for cannabis-based products in a world where cannabis has been descheduled.


Assuntos
Cannabis , Aprovação de Drogas/legislação & jurisprudência , Controle de Medicamentos e Entorpecentes/legislação & jurisprudência , Governo Federal , Legislação de Medicamentos , Legislação sobre Alimentos , Maconha Medicinal , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislação & jurisprudência , Canabinoides/uso terapêutico , Cannabis/classificação , Substâncias Controladas , Suplementos Nutricionais , Dronabinol , Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Regulamentação Governamental , História do Século XIX , História do Século XX , História Antiga , História Medieval , Humanos , Maconha Medicinal/classificação , Maconha Medicinal/história , Governo Estadual , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...